JMH Studio Draft v0.7
← 02 · Current State 03 · Competitive Set Analysis 04 · Impediments →

3. Competitive Set Analysis

The national landscape is bifurcating: a bolt-on model (most elite privates — electives, camps, faculty guidelines; AI in a support role) versus a pathway model (pioneer schools treating AI as a core academic track like math or history, with multi-year depth and project-based work). The pathway schools are the new benchmark — the evaluative question industry observers now ask is whether a school offers a multi-year comprehensive pathway or a one-off elective.

Positioning conclusion: no Florida Catholic or independent prep school appears to have a true multi-year emerging-tech pathway. Jesuit can leapfrog rather than chase — first-mover among values-based prep schools, with the formation angle no secular STEM school can copy.

Phase 0 deliverable

Full gap matrix: 8–10 schools × (courses, pathway depth, faculty model, industry partnerships, facilities, admissions marketing, tuition/enrollment trend). Output: positioning one-pager for the board.

SchoolCurrent postureRead
Berkeley Prep (Tampa)AI summer enrichment camps (incl. a Model UN + AI crisis-simulation camp); alumni-in-AI speaker events; a Curriculum Teaching & Learning Committee drafting AI usage guidelines; Apple Distinguished SchoolMost active local competitor, but still at the enrichment + guidelines stage — no formal pathway. Window is open.
Tampa PrepKnown for tech-forward identity (fab lab culture) — verify current AI offeringsLikely nearest-peer threat locally
Bolles (Jax), Pine Crest (Ft. Lauderdale), American HeritageTo be researched in depthPhase 0 deliverable
National tier (Harker, Choate i.d.Lab, Exeter, BASIS)Choate and Harker have run AI/robotics signature programs for yearsBenchmark for pathway design